Achieve Target Price and Earn Profits Too!
January 25, 2012 2 Comments
Whether launching a new product or expanding capabilities to accommodate our clients growing needs, meeting the target price is a significant barrier to earning new revenue streams and potential profits. Sometimes we take on new business opportunities as a way to gain market share, deepen relationships or to gain an advantage over the competition. While these strategies for new business serve their purposes well, it remains essential not only to meet the target price, but also to be profitable at the target price.
Fortunately, approaching target price challenges from both a design improvement and process improvement perspective allows us to open ourselves to a path toward meeting our objectives. A design and process improvement course can make taking risks less emotional and bring us into the realm of rational decision making. What if a design and process improvement method was consistently employed, and the data collected from these efforts demonstrated that a 10%, 15% or even 30% gain in profitability is likely.
One step in achieving a data driven decision-making model is to create processes that deliver reliable data needed to incorporate into an existing decision making and forecasting model. A process that generates and delivers this kind of information is presented below. It is an iterative process that synergizes with a well known Six Sigma concept, Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC).
Step One: Define Base Process
- Define base process
- Create value stream map
- Delineate sub-processes and assign cycle times to each
- Identify and document opportunities for improvement
- Present per product price and improvement opportunities
Step Two: Perform Project, Provide performance Feedback and Improvement Opportunities
- Actual cycle times
- Yield reporting
- Constraint analysis
- Feasibility study
- Incorporate actual data to engineer design for manufacturability model
- Material & equipment suitability
- Yield and process time optimization
Step Three: Adopt New Process
- Define new process
- Create new value stream map
- Delineate sub-processes and assign cycle times to each
- Identify and document opportunities for improvement
- Present per product price and improvement opportunities
Step Four: Perform New Process, Provide performance Feedback and Improvement Opportunities
- Actual cycle times
- Yield reporting
- Constraint analysis
- Feasibility study
- Incorporate actual data to engineer design for manufacturability model
- Material & equipment suitability
- Yield and process time optimization
This iterative process continues to deepen, creating an improvement perspective and can continue until all potential waste is removed, or can be finished when a desired target price and profit is met. The data gathered from the process can then be integrated into our decision-making models.
While the decision-making model currently in use may not be well structured and documented, we are making decisions and are therefore using some sort of model. Enhancing our awareness regarding how we go about making decisions and adding a rational perspective to our new business strategies can support our efforts to increase revenues and profits.
Click Here to download a case study supporting this model.
Click Here to begin a conversation on how ASAP can help meet your target price initiatives.
When designing for manufacturability one of the perceived downfalls is an increase in the cost of materials required for the design. Consider a master carton. Various designs of a master carton with similar dimensions, flute, and paperweight specifications have separate manufacturing costs. One design may require more board and another may require a more complicated die cut. Often design is viewed from a minimization of board and die cutting, leading to a cost only perspective.
Choosing a carton that maximizes your product’s protection without paying extra for an over-specified solution requires that you understand corrugated box construction. The first place to find out how the carton was designed is to understand the Box Certificate that is printed on most cartons.
Edge Crush Test – This is a new standard that is sometimes used in place of the Bursting Test. This measurement indicates the stacking strength of the carton by measuring the minimum pounds per linear inch needed to compress the edge of the corrugate board. This method of measurement allows manufacturers to use less expensive, lighter weight board than what is required for a Burst Test certified carton.
New product launches require great commitment, coordination and communication among and across a diverse cross section of specialized skills. Developing teams and partnerships to navigate the complexities inherent in new product launches becomes increasingly important as demand for speed to market increases while resources to facilitate speed decrease.
We understand the importance packaging plays in purchasing decisions. Often the quality of the package is only one of the determining factors in the complex purchasing decision-making process. Perhaps the most important factor, however, is how well brand strategy is communicated and integrated at the point of purchase.
We know it when we see it. It triggers a curious feeling, an impulse to pick it up, to touch it, and to bring it home with us. No, it is not a puppy! It is a great product -packaged with great care – in great packaging materials. Often, in the buyer’s eyes, the package the product is in, is synonymous with the product. People associate the quality of the product and the experience using the product with the packaging (marketing) the product is in. With packaging playing such an important factor in a product’s image and ultimately sales, here are five elements of packaging that helps to create a connection with the buyer.
When it comes to designing and preparing a prototype, the first questions we ask is, “What is the goal of the prototype?” The answer is not as obvious as you might think.
